Friday, May 19, 2017

Dear Sir or Madame - We Are Preexisting

Dear Mr. President and Members of Congress,

When my husband and I discovered that we were pregnant with our first child, we were elated. We had been trying for 9 years, off and on, and had all but given up. Plans were made, rooms were painted, dreams of who she would be and how we would guide her into this world were formed. We would sing, and finger-paint, and carry her in a sling. We would feed her organic food… and we would certainly never yell! Our lives would be complete, and we would be a happy family of three. 

In March of 2008, we learned that our, then, 3 month old baby girl was terminally ill. We sat in a conference room while our baby, Kai, received plasma transfusions, and a doctor placed her hand on my knee and told us our daughter was dying, and there was nothing she could do. She would have to be transferred to another hospital, and they weren’t sure if she would survive. 

We arrived at Georgetown University Hospital in Washington, DC. From there, she went through a whirl-wind battery of tests, and was diagnosed with end-stage liver failure, caused by a rare condition called Biliary Atresia. The cause was unknown, and she was so advanced that the only measure would be organ transplant. We went home on hospice not long after, understanding that an organ may not become available in time. 

Fortunately for us, my husband was a match. On April 9th, 2008, they were both wheeled into surgery. Seven hours later, my baby had a “new” liver. She had many other complications, however, and required another surgery to remove a blood clot and stop internal bleeding into her abdomen. She came out with a collapsed lung, unable to take any food by mouth for months. She was fed through an IV line that went to her heart. 

Following this myriad of surgeries and medical procedures, while my husband was still recovering himself, he lost his job. We were able to maintain coverage through COBRA until he could find another position, but it was expensive, and we had thousands of dollars racking up in medical bills. Our friends and family raised money to help, but the costs were truly astronomical, and we went for over a month without a paycheck.

Meanwhile, our daughter was in and out of the hospital for the next 3 years. Her immune system was suppressed to keep her from rejecting her new liver and she became ill easily and struggled to fight it off. Often needing blood transfusions, low-grade chemotherapy, and IV antibiotics to help her body rid itself of a virus or bacterial infection. On occasion, the insurance refused to cover it, and we had to pay out of pocket. Sometimes the medications were in excess of $1,000. Sometimes, an X-Ray was denied. Other times, a particular doctor at the hospital wasn’t covered under our plan. We incurred out of pocket costs that far exceeded those detailed on our plan. 

As insurance costs rose, our premiums, out of pocket maxes sky rocketed, and our health insurance provider continued to find loopholes to deny coverage to sustain our daughter’s life, we realized the only option we had to afford out daughter’s care without financial ruin was to start our own company, and select our own plan. This was about the time the Affordable Care Act (ACA) went into effect. 

We attempted to purchase a plan through the Maryland Exchange, but the issues with that process had caused such a back log, we feared a lapse in coverage would occur, even with the preexisting condition clause being signed into law. Thankfully, the non-profit health insurance provider we selected moved mountains to make sure that didn’t happen.

We were finally able to get Kai the care she needed, without constant battles and stretching our budget to extremes. I cannot begin to describe to you the sense of relief I felt after that first year. As Kai’s condition stabilized, we were finally able to begin to live a “normal” life. 

Now 9 years old, Kai attends public school. She has severe PTSD from waking up during a surgical procedure, which not only makes it difficult (sometimes impossible) for her to get routine tests, but it also causes disruptions in her daily life - panic attacks, anxiety, and ADHD-like symptoms. Her school implemented a 504 plan, and she has an EIP. Classes she was previously failing, she has an opportunity to excel at by making a few basic modifications. She feels safe at school because she has a school counselor and support staff that know her and are available to her when she is struggling. Unfortunately, many private schools in our area do not provide these services. We’ve looked. 

Recently, our non-profit health insurance carrier was forced out of the Maryland Exchange. They became a private, for-profit carrier, and our rates have increased substantially, each year. This past Monday, I received a call as I was dropping my kids off at school. I was informed that our health coverage would be terminated by the end of the business day due to a payment error - the rates had increased again and we had not adjusted our automatic payment to account for the difference. 

Furthermore, the American Health Care Act of 2017 just passed congress. While it states that the preexisting condition clause will remain in effect, it gives states the option to “opt-out” in favor of federal subsidies to create high-risk pools or to subsidize the health insurance companies directly to lower premiums. However, high-risk pools haven’t worked well, historically. There are often long wait lists, and people are shutout due to lack of funding. As for subsidizing the insurance companies, wouldn’t allowing them to opt-out give them the ability to deny preexisting conditions, while lowering their premiums for healthy individuals, all the while increasing their bottom line? 

Even if these were viable options, the $8 billion set aside for 5 years to cover these programs is not nearly enough to cover those with preexisting conditions. Experts say that it would cost $15-20 billion ANNUALLY to ensure that those with health issues, like my daughter’s, would be able to continue to receive coverage.

So, here we are, facing a lapse in health coverage with our child who has a life-threatening illness that will require life-long, costly medical care… for the third time. Here we are, looking at our beautiful, vibrant child who has struggled so hard just to have a chance at this life, and realizing that she may not be able to receive the care she needs to live - not just someday, but in the near future. While we would sell our very souls to ensure that she gets what she needs, I know that sometimes, that is not enough. We have two other children to provide for now, too.

In addition to the issues we face in healthcare, we’re told that the funding for IDEA, which provides the accommodations for our daughter’s 504 plan, and her IEP, will most likely be cut. That we will have “school choice”… a choice of schools who don’t provide these programs that level the playing field for children with disabilities. 

You want to talk about a population that is marginalized? I run a charity for families like ours, and I have seen them struggle in high-risk pools, and be denied by programs like Medicaid, just to get the care their children need to survive. Many don’t have any private schools within miles of where they live. Some work multiple jobs just to try and put food on the table, or drive their child to doctor’s appointments and the hospital, meanwhile staying up all night to tend to feeding tubes and medication schedules. Many times, they have to choose between buying groceries, or buying their child's medicine. 


You are leaving an entire population out of your decision making process. WE ARE PREEXISTING… And we vote.

Tuesday, May 9, 2017

My Preexisting Condition Story



Here's a scenario:
You and your spouse both work and have good-paying jobs. You both get benefits through those jobs and everything is great!
One day, you have a baby. That baby is diagnosed with a terminal illness. You go home on hospice care after being told your baby may not have much time left, and you can't work because your baby is in and out of the hospital and needs constant care.
Your spouse loses his job. Now, you have a baby that requires expensive medical attention, more than 20 medications to sustain her life, a transplant, home nursing, IV pumps and feeding tubes/machines, and frequent/long hospital stays. You have COBRA benefits for 30 days, but you're facing losing healthcare coverage after that time. Your baby has a pre-existing condition.
Now imagine a measure is passed, that is FAR from perfect, but it guarantees that you will have health coverage and it makes it so that coverage cannot be denied based on your baby's preexisting condition. WHEW! What a relief, right?!
Now imagine that baby, after years in and out of the hospital struggling with various illness and complications, is finally able to live a fairly normal life. She's beautiful, creative, vibrant, brave, kind... all the wonderful qualities you ever wanted her to possess. She still requires a lot of costly medical care and you work hard and pay through the nose to make sure she can receive it, but it's okay because you know that - even though it's expensive - she can't be denied and your premiums won't be that much higher than anyone else's because that's how insurance is supposed to work - everyone pays into a system and, when they need it, they get help covering the cost of medical procedures. It's a very socialistic process: some people may not need it as much (but will have it if they do) and some may need it a lot, but we all pay into it and everyone is covered.
Including your child, who will need it for the rest of her life, because she will probably still have long hospitalizations from time to time, she has a 1 in 6 chance of developing transplant related cancers and other cancers like leukemia and melanoma, she will probably require another transplant at some point in her lifetime, is in stage-1 renal failure, and she will always need to undergo invasive testing - not to mention that she has a pretty severe case of PTSD due to all this poking and prodding and needs regular therapy to help her live a normal life.
Now imagine that the government has decided to change all that. Now states can get special waivers that allow insurance companies to charge more for or deny coverage to people who have preexisting health conditions. Which means, your beautiful, vibrant child that has fought so hard to live, may not have health coverage and could be denied medical procedures and medicine that is necessary to SUSTAIN HER LIFE.
Did you get all that? Can you imagine it? If not, please read it again, carefully. Because that is my reality RIGHT NOW. And it might be your reality soon, too, because pregnancy, rape, and even acne are now listed as preexisting conditions under the AHCA.
Please, call your senators and ask them NOT to pass the AHCA. Lives could depend on it.
Please SHARE this post.

Tell Your Senators #NoAHCA

I know I haven't been posting much in the last few years. However, there is an important issue at hand... The AHCA. 

The AHCA is the new healthcare bill (H.R. 1628) that Congress just passed, and it effects all Americans. The AHCA does more than just repeal The ACA (Obamacare). It will raise insurance premiums for those who need healthcare the most: the elderly, the poor, and those with preexisting conditions. 

 This bill will now move on to the Senate to vote. If it passes, the President signs off on it, and it becomes law. WE CAN STOP THIS FROM HAPPENING!

 I'm urging everyone to please call their senators about the AHCA (American Healthcare Act). If your senators are Democratic and you know they plan to vote no on it, call the chair of the Senate Republican Policy Committee - John Barrasso (R - WY) and the Leader of the Senate Majority - Mitch McConnell (R - KY). Their contact info can be found at the bottom of this post, along with a link to help you find info for your state senators. 

You will be told they cannot respond because you are not in their constituency, and it's possible your comments may not even be passed along, but if a lot of people are calling, you better believe the heads of the Republican-controlled Senate will know about it! 

This is why you should call: 

Before the ACA went into effect, the Department of Health and Human Services broadened the definition of what "preexisting condition" includes. Insurance companies largely get to define what they consider to be a preexisting condition. So, if they decide that a c-section, or certain conditions relating to rape or domestic abuse (such as preventative HIV meds, for instance) are preexisting conditions, and you fall into that category, your health insurance coverage could get a whole lot more expensive. A WHOLE LOT. In fact, some of those with preexisting conditions could even be "priced out" of coverage, which means you would have access to it but it may be too expensive for you to afford.

If you are older than 55, your healthcare premiums (what you pay each month to purchase health insurance) could be 5 times more than younger adults. A 64 year old person with an income of $26,500 annually would have to pay $14,600 a year for health coverage alone. More than half of their income. If you are 65 or older, and you are on Medicaid, cuts to the program mean that your coverage would be capped - Medicaid will only pay up to a certain amount annually. After that, you're on your own. These caps are not expected to cover the healthcare needs of most Americans over 65. The AHCA would also allow for higher deductibles and out of pocket costs for older adults. 

Even if you are covered through your employer, your premiums and out of pocket costs would go up. 

If you have a preexisting condition as defined by your insurance company, your state can apply for waivers to drop your coverage if they can prove that it’s more expensive than “better coverage” that can be provided by the state. States that apply for these waivers will get federal subsidies (money from the federal government) to do one of two things: 

1. Create a high-risk pool to fund insurance for those with preexisting conditions. Historically, these high-risk pools have been very expensive. Often 125%-200% of a comparable private plan. There are often long wait-lists to get this coverage, as well, due to inadequate funding. Many times the federally-funded high-risk pools closed their doors to new enrollees altogether because they ran out of funding, leaving many people with preexisting conditions with no healthcare coverage at all. 

2. Reinsurance: Instead of creating the traditional high-risk pool detailed above, this option would allow states to give the money from the subsidies directly to the insurance companies to lower premiums. The ACA also did this during the transition period, however, no one was allowed to deny patients with preexisting conditions under the ACA. Under the AHCA, states could apply for these waivers to deny people with preexisting conditions coverage, and then pay the subsidies they receive for those waivers to the insurance companies, who still aren’t required to cover you, because their state applied for the waiver… so their costs could go down, but you may still be left without health coverage due to one little loophole. And, if anyone is good at finding loopholes and increasing their bottom line, it’s insurance companies!

If you have a preexisting condition and your state doesn’t apply for a waiver, insurance companies are allowed to charge you higher premiums than your healthier counterparts. Much higher. "On average, a 40-year-old with asthma would pay $4,270 more in premiums, while someone the same age with breast cancer would pay $28,230 extra."

Add to all this that the GOP has only proposed setting aside $8 Billion over 5 years to pay for these subsidies. Experts estimate that it would cost $25 Billion PER YEAR to cover those with preexisting conditions, meaning that $8 Billion just isn’t going to cut it, and millions of people with preexisting conditions could be left without health coverage. 

Furthermore, this plan would ration medical care to fund high-income tax cuts - meaning the people who benefit are those with high-income. They will pay less taxes at the cost of those with lower incomes and disabilities paying much more or possible losing health coverage all-together.

And yes, I have read the bill, personally. It’s hard to understand, and even many of the Republican law-makers that voted “yes” on it didn’t even read it in it’s entirety, but relied on their staffers to translate it for them. This is why it’s important to research and read, not just the bill itself, but also articles about it from various, reputable news outlets on both sides of the political spectrum, as well as government websites, to better understand what is at stake here. I’m honestly not 100% certain that even our elected officials completely understand it. As our own President once said, “Who knew healthcare was so complicated?”

Also, keep in mind that, currently, the members of congress who just passed this bill still get to keep their benefits under the ACA (Obamacare). So, this won't even effect them.

Concerned? You should be! Here’s the contact info to let the Senate know you want a better alternative:

Mitch McConnell
601 W. Broadway
Room 630
Louisville, KY 40202 
Phone: (502) 582-6304

John Barrasso
100 East B Street
Suite 2201
Casper, WY 82601
Main: 307-261-6413
P.O. Box 22201
Casper, WY 82602
Main: 307-261-6413

Things to keep in mind: Be professional and respectful. No one will listen to you if you lose your cool and your comments most certainly won’t be passed along. Stay on topic - pick several talking points and make it short and sweet. 

If your Senators are Republican, contact them directly. You can find their info here: https://www.senate.gov/senators/contact/

YES, DO SHARE THIS POST! Copy/paste or share directly. 

#NoAHCA #WeArePreexisting 

Sources:
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/what-the-ahcas-preexisting-condition-rules-could-cost-you/
https://www.verywell.com/high-risk-pools-1738930
https://www.forbes.com/forbes/welcome/?toURL=https://www.forbes.com/sites/johngoodman/2017/05/02/high-risk-pools-worked-just-fine-before-obamacare/&refURL=https://www.facebook.com/&referrer=https://www.facebook.com/#2070ed3be78d
http://chirblog.org/whats-difference-reinsurance-high-risk-pool-two-approaches-insuring-pre-existing-conditions/
https://rules.house.gov/bill/115/hr-1628

http://www.businessinsider.com/ahca-high-risk-pools-healthcare-vote-obamacare-2017-5

Wednesday, July 27, 2016

Accidental Feminist

Hello,  Interwebs! As the first woman presidential candidate is nominated, I'm here, today, to talk about another hotly debated issue: Women's Rights.

I'm not talking about the right to vote. Or equality in pay. I'm talking about Rape Culture. The story I'm going to follow this up with may not strike you as rape culture, but, I assure you... it is.

I took my kids to the library, today, to drop off some books that were over due. As I walked away, a man called after me and followed me back to my car, until I stopped to see what he wanted. He said, almost verbatim, "Don't you know you're beautiful? Don't mark yourself up like that! Why do you want all that on your beautiful body? Don't do that!"

Dear Mr. Creepy Stranger at the Library,

Let's analyze this... Because I'm an attractive woman, it gives you the right to call after me and assert your unsolicited opinion that YOU don't like to see my tattoos? In front of my kids? Somehow, being attractive doesn't give me the right to do what I want with my body? Because it makes me less attractive... to you? 

First of all, my body isn't an object for your admiration, nor does my value rely on my appearance or your opinion of my appearance. Second, I'm an adult and I can make my own choices regarding MY body. Third, what kind of message does that send my kids?

Sincerely,
The PERSON at the Library That You Verbally Assaulted

If you think I'm overreacting, think about what he said, and what it implies: Because he found me attractive, he feels he has the right to an judge my appearance, and to tell me what he doesn't like about it, to stop doing what he doesn't like with MY body, because HE doesn't like it, but he likes my body, in front of my kids. He, as a man, has a right to tell a woman he finds attractive how she should look, because it pleases him. To violate my privacy, insult me, devalue me as a human being by implying that my value lies in his opinion of my appearance, and put me in an uncomfortable and vulnerable position. He was asserting his power over me. If that's not an example of rape culture, I don't know what is. 

If you want to tell a woman she is beautiful, go ahead. While you're at it, compliment her intellect. Maybe compliment the fact that I take my three kids to the library! Just because you think a woman is beautiful doesn't give you the right to pick and choose what you do or don't like about her appearance, or tell her what she should and shouldn't do with HER body. I don't go around telling guys, "Wow, you're really attractive but you should stop eating so many cheese burgers..." 

He might not even realize how offensive his comments were. This guy has NO idea how he completely devalued me IN FRONT of my kids, and how much I held my tongue for their benefit, because who knows how he would have reacted or what he would have said had I really given him a piece of my mind - because the woman who speaks out against that kind of abusive behavior isn't playing her part. She's not being submissive and demure. She's a proverbial four-letter-word that starts with a B or a C. Right? 

That's the exact line of thinking that allows a college athlete to get off the hook with "boys-will-be-boys" after he rapes a woman behind a dumpster. 


Women are not prey. We're not here solely for your enjoyment and pleasure. We're daughters, sisters, mothers... Humans. Please treat us with the respect we deserve.